For years, Jimmy Fallon’s version of The Tonight Show has stood as late-night television’s warm bath — playful, harmless, and reliably apolitical. It’s the place where celebrities play games, musicians jam, and the world’s chaos briefly fades into laughter. But in 2025, that refuge looks increasingly out of sync with the rest of the genre — and, some argue, with the times.
A growing chorus of fans and critics are questioning whether Fallon’s good-natured escapism still fits the moment. On social media, clips of Fallon explaining that his show “hits both sides equally” and that he tries to “keep [his] head down” have sparked debate. His colleagues — Stephen Colbert, Jimmy Kimmel, and Seth Meyers — have transformed their programs into platforms for political commentary, sometimes courting controversy in the process. Fallon, meanwhile, seems determined to remain the one host who simply wants everyone to have a good time.
The Odd Man Out in Late Night
When Fallon took over The Tonight Show in 2014, his style was refreshing. He brought a musical, improvisational energy to the job, leaning into sketches and celebrity collaborations rather than topical monologues. Viewers loved it. His easy rapport made stars seem human and the audience feel included.
But as politics began to dominate cultural conversation — particularly after 2016 — that neutrality started to feel like avoidance. Colbert’s Late Show surged ahead in ratings by turning nightly monologues into a running critique of Washington. Kimmel embraced a more personal brand of activism, becoming known for his heartfelt political segments as much as for his comedy. Meyers used “A Closer Look” to dissect daily headlines with razor precision.
Against that backdrop, Fallon’s refusal to “take a side” began to stand out not as professionalism but as passivity.
The Hair-Tousling That Still Lingers
It didn’t help that Fallon’s most infamous television moment — playfully mussing Donald Trump’s hair during a 2016 interview — came to define his approach. To some, it symbolized the pitfalls of friendliness in an era demanding accountability. Fallon later apologized, saying he never intended to normalize a divisive political figure. But the image stuck.
Eight years later, Fallon remains haunted by that viral clip. To critics, it crystallized everything frustrating about his brand of late-night: genial, conflict-averse, and reluctant to engage. To his defenders, it was proof of something else entirely — that The Tonight Show was never supposed to be Meet the Press.
Built for Escape, Not Engagement
It’s worth remembering that Fallon inherited a legacy of apolitical humor. Johnny Carson defined The Tonight Show as America’s nightly decompression chamber. Jay Leno maintained that formula, leaning on observational jokes and celebrity interviews. Even Conan O’Brien, whose style skewed absurdist and cerebral, generally avoided politics in favor of pure comedy.
Fallon has always been the heir to that lineage. His version of The Tonight Show is built on goodwill — on the idea that audiences want to laugh without being reminded of the world’s divisions. His sketches, from “Wheel of Musical Impressions” to “Lip Sync Battle,” invite celebrities to drop their guard, not defend their values.
To his credit, that formula still works for millions. Fallon’s YouTube clips rack up tens of millions of views, particularly among younger audiences who see him less as a political commentator and more as a host who feels accessible. For every critic calling him out of touch, there’s a fan who appreciates that The Tonight Show remains one of the few places where politics rarely intrudes.
The Changing Definition of Late Night
The challenge is that the very definition of late-night television has changed. The format once served as a nightly escape; now it functions as a running commentary on American life.
Since the Trump era, audiences have come to expect their late-night hosts to articulate outrage, humor, and even moral perspective. Colbert and Meyers turned topicality into their brand. Kimmel’s tears during monologues about gun violence and healthcare became viral moments that blurred the line between comedy and conscience.
Fallon’s decision to stay in the middle now reads less like an artistic choice and more like an anachronism.
“The world got more political, and late-night followed suit,” says media analyst Laurie Starke. “Fallon never changed lanes. That’s not wrong — but it makes him look like he’s driving a different car entirely.”
The “Nice Guy” Dilemma
It’s not entirely fair to criticize Fallon for doing the kind of show he’s always done. His charm lies in his sincerity, and his genuine laughter — sometimes mocked as excessive — remains his calling card. Viewers who crave relief from polarization still find comfort in his energy.
But that very geniality can make him a lightning rod in an era when silence reads as complicity. By refusing to define himself politically, Fallon risks being defined by others.
“Nice” is not a dirty word, but it’s a tricky one. The qualities that once made Fallon the ultimate crowd-pleaser — warmth, inclusivity, a lack of edge — now make him an outlier.
Not Entirely Apolitical
For all the talk of Fallon’s neutrality, he hasn’t stayed completely above the fray. He publicly supported Colbert when CBS announced The Late Show’s upcoming end, calling him “a friend and a legend.” He defended Kimmel during his suspension following a politically charged monologue.
And despite his nonconfrontational tone, Fallon hasn’t escaped political heat himself. Trump has repeatedly insulted him, calling him “a moron” and urging NBC to fire him. For someone who supposedly avoids controversy, Fallon has attracted his share of it.
It’s also worth noting that his team has gently edged The Tonight Show toward the modern moment in small ways: featuring guests who represent diverse communities, highlighting charitable causes, and occasionally addressing current events through musical comedy rather than monologue.
A Divided Audience
The debate over Fallon’s relevance ultimately mirrors the division in American audiences themselves. Some viewers want their comedy to challenge authority; others want a reprieve from it. Fallon represents the latter — a place where pop culture still reigns over politics.
His challenge isn’t lack of talent or sincerity but shifting expectations. Viewers no longer agree on what late-night TV is for.
For every tweet deriding him as “boring,” another praises him for providing joy “without the doomscroll energy.” His longevity — over a decade in the chair — suggests that, while his critics are loud, his audience remains large.
What Fallon Understands (and What He Might Miss)
Fallon’s greatest strength is his commitment to fun — the spontaneous, unpretentious kind that makes The Tonight Show feel like an afterparty rather than a political seminar. In an industry that rewards outrage, he’s chosen optimism. That’s not nothing.
Yet as late-night hosts increasingly define themselves as truth-tellers and advocates, Fallon’s refusal to evolve may eventually make his geniality feel like avoidance. Comedy doesn’t have to be political, but it does have to be relevant — and the line between those two grows thinner every year.
The Legacy Question
As The Tonight Show heads toward its second decade under Fallon, the question isn’t whether he should change — it’s whether audiences still want the kind of show he wants to make.
Late-night television has always mirrored the culture it serves. Right now, that culture is polarized, anxious, and hungry for catharsis. Colbert and Kimmel provide it through pointed commentary; Meyers through wry analysis. Fallon, ever the entertainer, still believes laughter alone can unite people.
If that feels old-fashioned, it’s also admirable. The risk, of course, is that in trying to please everyone, he pleases fewer and fewer.
Closing Thoughts
Jimmy Fallon’s Tonight Show has never claimed to be a pulpit. It’s a playground — and in that sense, he’s stayed true to his mission. But as late-night evolves into a hybrid of comedy, activism, and cultural therapy, his brand of cheerful neutrality may be harder to sustain.
Fair or not, Fallon now represents something rare: a reminder of what late-night used to be before it became a forum for the national mood. Whether that nostalgia will keep him afloat or leave him stranded in a changing media landscape remains to be seen.
For now, Fallon keeps smiling, keeps playing the games, and keeps his head down — perhaps not because he’s afraid to speak, but because he still believes laughter, all by itself, can say enough.
News
Fair or not, Jimmy Fallon’s safe Tonight Show looks out of touch to some fans
For years, Jimmy Fallon’s version of The Tonight Show has stood as late-night television’s warm bath — playful, harmless, and…
John Oliver’s “Brass Balls” for Trump: A Sharp Take on Presidential Legacy
On Sunday night, John Oliver gave viewers of HBO’s Last Week Tonight another lesson in how absurdity can illuminate corruption….
Comic Accuses SNL of Copying “ChatGBTio” Sketch — and Rekindles a Familiar Debate
For nearly fifty years, Saturday Night Live has been both a launchpad for new comedy and a lightning rod for…
More SNL Moves: Bryan Tucker on Leave, Erik Kenward Upped to Head Writer
Fifty-one seasons in, Saturday Night Live remains one of television’s most enduring creative ecosystems—a weekly experiment in comedy that somehow…
Inside SNL’s Writers’ Room Shuffle: Bryan Tucker Steps Back, Erik Kenward Steps Up
Fifty-one seasons in, Saturday Night Live remains one of television’s most enduring creative ecosystems—a weekly experiment in comedy that somehow…
Dog Won’t Stop Barking at Coffin During Funeral—Son Opens It and Discovers It’s Empty
Ethan Parker felt like it had been ages since he last heard from his stepdaughter, Lily. Their relationship had always…
End of content
No more pages to load