‘F off’: Megyn Kelly Blasts ‘Weird Leftists’ Attacking Sydney Sweeney! 😠
The backlash against Sydney Sweeney’s ad just got fiercer—now Megyn Kelly’s stepping in with a brutal takedown! 🔥 Are the critics unhinged, or is there more to this heated feud? The drama’s exploding…
‘F off’: Megyn Kelly Defends Sydney Sweeney from ‘Weird Leftists’
In a fiery segment on her show, Megyn Kelly didn’t hold back when defending Sydney Sweeney against what she called the “weird leftists” fueling the backlash over the actress’s American Eagle ad. The controversy, which erupted in late July 2025, has snowballed into a cultural flashpoint, with Kelly’s blunt response—“F off”—capturing the frustration of many who see the outrage as unhinged and overblown. As the internet divides into camps of supporters and detractors, Kelly’s defense highlights a broader battle against what she and others view as excessive “woke” scrutiny. With Sweeney staying silent amid the storm, and American Eagle standing firm, this saga raises questions about celebrity, beauty standards, and the limits of online activism. Let’s explore Kelly’s takedown, the ad’s origins, and why this feud has gripped the public in August 2025.
The Ad That Ignited the Firestorm
The spark came from American Eagle’s fall 2025 denim campaign, launched on July 23, featuring Sweeney as the face of their jeans line. The ad plays on a simple pun: “Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans,” twisting “genes” into “jeans” to highlight the product. In the videos, Sweeney delivers a breathy narration about genetics—“Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color… My jeans are blue”—while striking poses in denim, leaning over a Ford Mustang or zipping up pants in close-up shots. The campaign promotes “The Sydney Jean,” a wide-legged pair with a butterfly design symbolizing domestic violence awareness, with all proceeds benefiting Crisis Text Line, a mental health nonprofit.
What was intended as fun, nostalgic marketing quickly turned toxic. Critics on TikTok, Threads, and X accused the ad of promoting eugenics and white supremacy, pointing to Sweeney’s blonde hair and blue eyes as evidence of a “dog whistle” for racial superiority. The “genes” pun, they argued, evoked discredited pseudoscience tied to Nazi ideals, especially in a politically charged climate post-2024 election. Feminist voices piled on, slamming the ad’s visuals for objectifying Sweeney through a male gaze, with lingering shots on her figure reminiscent of controversial campaigns from decades past. One viral TikTok called it “fascist propaganda,” while others decried it as tone-deaf and exclusionary, ignoring diverse body types and ethnicities.
The backlash gained traction, drawing comparisons to a similar Dunkin’ Donuts ad released days later, where actor Gavin Casalegno attributed his tan to “genetics.” Suddenly, it was framed as a troubling trend: brands pushing Eurocentric beauty standards in a supposed rejection of “woke” inclusivity.
Megyn Kelly Enters the Fray
Enter Megyn Kelly, the former Fox News host and current podcaster, who addressed the controversy on her show in late July 2025. Kelly didn’t mince words, labeling the critics “weird leftists” and telling them to “F off.” She argued that the outrage was absurd, emphasizing that there’s “nothing wrong with being hot” or celebrating attractiveness. “Only the weird leftists have chosen to freak out over this,” Kelly said, dismissing claims of eugenics as overreaching hysteria. She praised Sweeney for her unapologetic appeal, calling her a symbol of natural beauty in an era where such traits are increasingly politicized.
Kelly’s defense resonated with her audience, who see her as a voice against what they call excessive political correctness. She tied the backlash to a broader pattern of the left attacking successful, attractive women who don’t fit their narrative. “It’s like they can’t stand seeing a beautiful, confident woman succeed without turning it into some conspiracy,” Kelly remarked, echoing sentiments from supporters who view the ad as harmless fun. Her comments went viral, amassing thousands of shares on X and sparking debates across platforms. Right-wing commentators applauded her, with one X user tweeting, “Megyn Kelly just destroyed the woke mob—Sweeney’s ad is gold!”
This isn’t Kelly’s first rodeo in cultural wars. Known for her no-nonsense style, she’s defended figures like J.K. Rowling and criticized what she calls “cancel culture.” Here, her intervention amplified the narrative that the outrage is manufactured, driven by jealousy or ideological bias rather than genuine concern.
Why the Backlash Feels Manufactured
The accusations against the ad stretch credibility. Is a jeans pun really a call to eugenics? Critics point to Sweeney’s features as “proof,” but that ignores the ad’s context: a lighthearted promo with a charitable bent. The “genes” reference is a setup for the jeans twist, not a deep dive into racial theory. As Kelly noted, the left’s reaction seems disproportionate, turning a marketing gimmick into a symbol of fascism. This overreach mirrors past scandals, like the 2023 Bud Light backlash, where brands become proxies in culture wars.
Feminist critiques add another layer of irony. While some decry the ad’s “male gaze,” Sweeney has built her brand on owning her image—from her MMA training to her candid talks about body positivity. The close-ups, including her playful “eyes up here” line, feel self-aware, not exploitative. Yet, detractors reduce her to a victim, ignoring her agency. Kelly’s “F off” cuts through this, calling out the hypocrisy of those who claim to empower women but attack those who succeed on their terms.
The timing fuels suspicion. Post-2024 election, with cultural divides stark, every ad becomes a battleground. Critics tie it to anti-immigrant rhetoric, but that link feels forced. Meanwhile, the Dunkin’ ad’s similar “genetics” line suggests a coincidental trend, not a conspiracy.
Supporters Rally Around Sweeney
Not everyone’s raging—far from it. On X and Instagram, fans defend Sweeney with memes and praise, calling the ad “iconic” and the backlash “jealousy.” Polls cited by American Eagle insiders show 70% customer approval, with the campaign boosting stock by 19% on launch day. Sweeney’s meme stock status underscores her appeal: relatable, talented, and unfiltered. Supporters see Kelly’s defense as a win against “woke” overreach, with one X post declaring, “Megyn Kelly just ended the left—Sweeney’s too hot for their nonsense.”
Sweeney’s silence speaks volumes. Amid the storm, she’s focused on projects like Euphoria Season 3, letting her work do the talking. Her background—from a modest upbringing to Hollywood stardom—makes her a folk hero for those tired of celebrity victim narratives.
American Eagle’s Firm Stance
American Eagle hasn’t flinched. Their August 1 statement reaffirmed the ad’s intent: “Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story.” No apology, no edits—a bold move in cancel culture’s shadow. Insiders say the brand views the outrage as noise from a vocal minority, confident in the campaign’s charitable core and Sweeney’s draw. This defiance signals a shift: brands betting on mainstream support over progressive appeasement.
Broader Cultural Implications
Kelly’s takedown highlights a turning tide. “Woke is dead,” as many X users proclaim, with companies like American Eagle and Dunkin’ embracing unapologetic marketing. The left’s focus on trivialities—jeans puns as fascism—dilutes real issues, making their arguments laughable. As Kelly said, it’s “weird” to freak out over beauty. This feud exposes the exhaustion with performative activism, where every celeb becomes a target.
For Sweeney, it’s a boon. Controversy cements her as a cultural icon, transcending acting into meme royalty. Kelly’s “F off” echoes a sentiment: enough with the hate—let her shine.
What’s Next?
As the dust settles, expect more defenses from figures like Kelly. Sweeney’s silence keeps her above the fray, while American Eagle rides the buzz. The real loser? Nuanced discourse, drowned in outrage. But with fans loving it and stocks rising, this “controversy” might just be the ad’s best promo.
In 2025, beauty’s back—and the weird leftists can “F off.”
News
“I’M ELON MUSK’S FIRSTBORN — AND I WANT PROOF”: 40-YEAR-OLD KENYAN ACTIVIST CLAIMS TO BE MUSK’S SECRET SON, DEMANDS DNA TEST IN GLOBAL BOMBSHELL In a jaw-dropping twist that’s lighting up headlines around the world, a 40-year-old Kenyan mental health activist has come forward with a claim that could upend everything we thought we knew about Elon Musk. His words were calm—but his demand was seismic: “I want a DNA test. I deserve the truth.” The man, whose identity remains closely guarded, says he was born in Kenya during a period when Musk was in his early 20s—and only recently uncovered clues pointing to the Tesla titan as his biological father. Now the world’s watching and asking: Could the world’s richest man really have a hidden heir? Was there a chapter in Elon Musk’s life the world was never meant to see? And if this is true… what happens to the legacy? The silence from Musk is deafening. The demand? Unavoidable. And what’s buried in the past may soon surface. Full shocking details unfolding now 👇
Man Claims He’s Elon Musk’s Son — Demands DNA Test in Stunning Paternity Dispute In a bizarre and unexpected twist…
“SHE BEAT CANCER. SHE HAD A BABY. THEN SHE DISAPPEARED…” — KAT TIMPF RETURNS TO GUTFELD! WITH BABY MIRA IN HER ARMS, MELTING MILLIONS OF HEARTS IN RECORD-BREAKING MOMENT! In a moment that no one saw coming—and no one will forget—Kat Timpf made her emotional return to Gutfeld! last night, not with a monologue… but with Baby Mira in her arms. The crowd immediately rose to their feet. Tyrus stepped forward, visibly moved. Greg Gutfeld beamed. And Kat? She fought back tears as the studio filled with applause. No punchlines. No politics. Just one powerful, personal moment. After beating cancer, welcoming her first child, and stepping away from the spotlight, Kat returned with a presence that said more than words ever could. And Baby Mira? She quietly stole the show—and the hearts of 2.5 million viewers (and counting). Fox News has never seen a moment like this. TV’s tiniest breakout star is here… and fans can’t stop watching. See the unforgettable moment below 👇
Kat Timpf is back—stronger, sharper, and more inspiring than ever. In one of the most powerful moments in recent Fox…
“‘THAT’S RIDICULOUS’ — KAROLINE LEAVITT SHUTS DOWN NBC REPORTER OVER CONTROVERSIAL QUESTION, LEAVING THE ROOM STUNNED!” In a tense and unscripted exchange that’s now going viral, Karoline Leavitt took control of the moment when an NBC reporter hit her with what she called a “ridiculous” question. Without missing a beat, Leavitt fired back with razor-sharp precision, instantly silencing the room and catching the reporter completely off guard. The atmosphere shifted. Cameras rolled. No one spoke. And in that moment, it was clear: Leavitt wasn’t just rejecting the question—she was making a statement. Was it a power move? A media trap expertly dodged? Or the beginning of a larger shift in how political figures fight back in real time? The clip is spreading fast—and the fallout is already heating up. Full moment and breakdown below 👇
“That’s Ridiculous”: Karoline Leavitt’s Fiery NBC Clash Captures the Turbulent Pulse of 2025 Political Discourse In the age of viral…
“I’LL FOLLOW BRITTNEY GRINER OUT OF AMERICA” — JASMINE CROCKETT’S STUNNING DECLARATION IGNITES NATIONAL FIRESTORM: ‘THERE’S NO RESPECT FOR TALENT HERE’ In a jaw-dropping moment that’s rapidly going viral, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett shocked her audience by declaring she’s ready to leave the United States—standing firmly in solidarity with WNBA star Brittney Griner. Citing what she called “a country that no longer values greatness,” Crockett’s statement has instantly sparked a tidal wave of outrage, support, and fierce national debate. Her words didn’t just echo—they detonated. Social media is ablaze, politicians are scrambling to respond, and fans on both sides are asking: Is this the beginning of a celebrity and public figure exodus? Is Crockett’s statement an emotional outburst, or a calculated strike against a system she believes has failed her? What exactly triggered this bold departure from the script—and how far is she willing to go? Full story unfolding now — and the fallout may reshape the conversation around fame, race, and patriotism in 2025 👇
Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett’s Bold Statement Sparks National Debate: What Does It Mean to Be American in 2025? In a striking…
End of content
No more pages to load