In what’s being called a political earthquake, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has dropped a shockwave-declassified report accusing former President Barack Obama and his intelligence chiefs of fabricating claims of Russian interference in the 2016 election to sabotage Donald Trump. The revelations—and Trump’s triumphant approval—have ignited fiery controversy amid the ongoing Epstein scandal, fueling speculation that this is a classic distract-and-deflect tactic.

Hold on tight—because the political storm just hit DEFCON 1.

 Gabbard’s EXPLOSIVE Report: Undermining the Russia Narrative?

On July 23, Gabbard released a 44‑page declassified document originating from a 2017 Republican-led House Intelligence Committee report. While it reaffirms that Russia did try to interfere in the 2016 election, it challenges the conclusion that Putin deliberately favored Trump over Clinton. Instead, it casts doubt on the integrity of the Obama-era intelligence community, accusing them of “manufacturing” or exaggerating evidence to help spur investigations into Trump’s campaign.

“What we are seeing is egregious weaponization of intelligence, partisan politicization of raw data, manufacturing a narrative of Russian favoritism,” Gabbard declared in an Oval Office appearance on July 23 .

Gabbard’s statement goes further—she’s referring her findings to the Department of Justice, hinting at possible criminal charges for Obama-era leaders .

 Trump Celebrates, But What’s the REAL Motive?

President Trump, under fire for failing to release Jeffrey Epstein files, immediately applauded Gabbard’s move—calling it vindication. In a White House press conference, he lashed out at Obama, declaring he was “caught dead to rights with TREASON” and likening the declassified document to a “coup plot” .

Critics are crying foul. They say Gabbard’s report and Trump’s searing rhetoric are designed to shift attention away from renewed outrage over Trump’s handling of the Epstein investigation .

“It’s a classic move: when cornered, play the distraction game,” said one analyst.
*Hashtags like #EpsteinFilesNow and #ObamaCoup are trending hard.

 Obama’s Camp Fires Back—Calling It “Ridiculous” and Dangerous

Obama’s spokesperson, Patrick Rodenbush, responded sharply:

“These tossed-around, politically dubious claims are ridiculous—a weak attempt at distraction,” he said, referencing Gabbard’s report while reaffirming that the Russia meddling conclusion remains intact and valid .

Intelligence veterans also condemned the move. Sen. Mark Warner warned the documents risk exposing “intelligence sources and methods,” possibly jeopardizing national security and alienating foreign allies .

 The Fallout: Treason Claims, Investigations, and Political Tension

Gabbard went even further—hinting she might push for treason charges and calling the alleged manipulation a “years-long coup attempt” .

The DOJ has since launched a “strike force” to assess the matter .

But Democrats see this as pure political theater—an attempt to rewrite history and deflect from Trump’s Epstein links .

Former media analyst blasted it as “Stalin-level distraction” .

Even AI chatbot Grok, owned by Elon Musk, called the move “unsubstantiated” and a transparent attempt to divert from the Epstein scandal .

 Where’s the Truth?

Here’s what we know:

Gabbard’s report is from a Republican House review—it doesn’t dispute that Russia meddled, only questions the confidence in the extent of their favoritism toward Trump. Critics note bipartisan Senate reviews widely reaffirmed the original conclusions .
Gabbard’s referral to DOJ marks a serious escalation—but there’s skepticism over whether she actually has new evidence beyond memo-level disputes.
Obama’s team and intelligence experts warn that releasing such documents could undermine U.S. intelligence credibility and trust with allies .
The timing—amid Trump’s Epstein file controversies—suggests a carefully coordinated deflect-and-distract operation .

 What This Means Heading Into Election 2024

With the 2024 election cycle ramping up, these developments are more than mere noise—they’re dangerous flashpoints:

Trump supporters are rallying behind Gabbard, claiming vindication and justice.
Democrats are seizing on the Epstein scandal, arguing that Trump’s credibility is crumbling—and accusing him of weaponizing intelligence for political benefit.
Moderates are sitting on the fence, torn between demands for transparency and concerns over political manipulation of intelligence.

The aftermath could dramatically reshape the election narrative—and raise the stakes on what counts as truth in modern politics.

 Final Take: Intelligence or Illusion?

Is this a moment of reckoning—or a smoke screen?

If Gabbard’s claims hold up, it could be one of the biggest scandals in modern political history—Obama implicating his own agencies in undermining a president.
If it falters, it will look like a desperate distraction by Trump to dodge criticism over Epstein files.
And if intelligence source concealment costs us credibility, we all lose—as global partners question the reliability of U.S. policy.

One thing’s for certain: Reality, as we know it in Washington, just fractured again—and the next few weeks will determine whether this is history—or just another political illusion.

🔥 Click now to read the full declassified report and see the smoking-gun evidence that has Capitol Hill on fire!