DWTS DRAMA: ABC Cracks Down with Tough New Judging Rules After Shocking Favoritism Allegations

14 Things You Didn't Know About 'Dancing With the Stars'

A storm has hit the Dancing with the Stars ballroom — and this time, it’s not the choreography causing the chaos. Following weeks of viewer complaints and accusations of biased scoring, ABC and the DWTS production team have introduced a new rule that’s shaking up Hollywood.

Insiders reveal the message to judges is clear: “Think before scoring.” Executives warn that any signs of favoritism, bias, or inconsistent evaluations could trigger disciplinary action — and in extreme cases, legal review. The glittering dance floor now carries a new weight: accountability.

Tensions behind the scenes have reportedly reached a boiling point. High-profile contestants and their teams raised concerns about “unfair scoring discrepancies” that may have affected eliminations, turning fan whispers into one of the show’s most serious internal investigations in recent history.

Fans are celebrating the move as long overdue. Social media erupted with reactions like: “FINALLY! It’s about time the judging was held to a real standard,” and “Maybe now the best dancer will actually win.”

DWTS 2025: Kyle Shilling is crowned the winner - The Australian Women's  Weekly

But not everyone is happy. Some insiders worry that judges will feel pressured to second-guess every score. “The spontaneity might be gone,” one former contestant warned. “DWTS has always been about emotion as much as technique — now it might start feeling like a courtroom.”

ABC stands firm. “We value fairness, transparency, and respect for every performer who steps onto that stage. Our judging process must reflect that integrity,” the network stated.

While no specific judges were named, recent controversial scoring moments have sparked speculation among fans. With the new rule in effect, DWTS faces a crossroads: will the ballroom return to pure talent and artistry, or will heightened scrutiny fuel even more drama? One thing is certain — the sparkle remains, but the stakes have never been higher.